Re: Missed Question for doctor

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: jamie: "Re: likelyhood of twin absorbtion"
• Previous message: jamie: "Re: Ovulation During Pregnancy"
• In reply to: p: "Missed Question for doctor"

At Thu, 12 Jun 2003, p wrote: >
>>>my progesterone at day 21 was 10.03
>>>8 years ago i was at .03 on day 21 and was on oral progesterone for 7
>>>years--now my RE took me off completely and there is all sorts of
>>>conflicting info out there on what it should be. What is your opinion?
>>>Do you think a 10 means ovulation?
>>>if i would get pregnant, would it "kick in" or would i miscarry because
>>>of too little progesterone.
>>>We/ve been ttc for 10 years and Dh had a vericocele repair in December
>>>2002 - hopefully S/A is better and maybe i could get pregnant on my own
>>>--but I'm worried about progesterone #s.
>>
>>Jessica Bardales MD did respond to this question but she must not have read that i was not pregnant now by trying to concieve for 10 years.
>Thank you for any help

--
Alicia M. Lapidus M.D.
Director Obgyn.net Latina
Chief of Staff Obstetrics, Hospital J. A. Fernández
Buenos Aires
Argentina
Note:  opinions expressed here are for educational purposes
       only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient
       relationship.  This information is not intended to supplant
       the need for you to consult with your physician prior to
       choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.

       **Private emails cannot be entertained due to time
       constraints; consequently, they will receive no response.

• Next message: jamie: "Re: likelyhood of twin absorbtion"
• Previous message: jamie: "Re: Ovulation During Pregnancy"
• In reply to: p: "Missed Question for doctor"