Re: Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "a second gestational sac?"
• Previous message: Lisa: "Re: Viable Pregnancy with starting Progesterone after a BFP"
• In reply to: Lesley: "Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates"
• Next in thread: Dianna: "Re: Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates"
• Reply: Dianna: "Re: Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates"

At Fri, 6 Jun 2003, Lesley wrote: >
>My LMP was on the 19th of April and I estimate the date of conception to
>be between 4 - 9th of may. This would make me approx 6 weeks pregnant
>(or just over). I had an ultrasound today which showed a gestational
>sac of 6mm but no yolk sac or fetal poles. The sonographer thought the
>pregnancy was no more than 5 weeks. Is this pregnancy likely to be OK
>considering the discrepancy between my dates and the u/s dates and the
>lack of a yolk sac and fetal poles?
>I am certain of my dates.
>Thanks for any help
>
>--
>Lesley
>

• Next message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "a second gestational sac?"
• Previous message: Lisa: "Re: Viable Pregnancy with starting Progesterone after a BFP"
• In reply to: Lesley: "Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates"
• Next in thread: Dianna: "Re: Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates"
• Reply: Dianna: "Re: Discrepancy in u/s and LMP dates"