![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: induction vs. c-section? help me decideFrom: Kellie (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 12 May 2003 23:01:51 -0500 (CDT)
At Mon, 12 May 2003, Arlene wrote: > >I am currently 40w6d. I have been at 80-90% effaced, 1-2 cm dialated >with the baby at -3 to -1 station for the past 4 weeks. I have been >having regular contractions (4-5 minutes apart) that are consistently >getting more painful and longer in duration. I spent the night in the >hospital last night, but they sent me home becuase there has been no >change in my cervix. My baby is also measuring HUGE (9lbs. 7oz in u/s >at 40w1d). I am scheduled for an induction on Thursday, but I have a >few questions... >1.My Doc uses a catheter/balloon inserted into the cervix to induce. Has >anyone ever heard of this? How painful is it? He says its less painful >that Cervidel/Pitocin, but since he's never gone through it, I'd like to >hear from someone who has. >2. Is is possible that because the baby is so large, his head won't fit >through my pelvis? Could that be why I'm not dialating more? >3. I'm worried about shoulder dystocia (sp?) and going through hell >with labor and end up just having to have a c-section anyway. > >Thanks for your input! I've been induced, and I've had a C-section, and the induction was much easier! But I've always been induced with pictocin. So I'm unsure about this proceedure. Beware of the C-section......recovery is MUCH HARDER and longer.
-- Kellie
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |