Re: Question about u/s_pls read

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Raichael: "Re: Drawbacks to natural birth?"
• Previous message: Michelle: "Tenderness in abdominal area"
• In reply to: Shelie: "Re: Question about u/s_pls read"
• Next in thread: Shelie: "Re: Question about u/s_pls read"
• Reply: Shelie: "Re: Question about u/s_pls read"

At Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Shelie wrote: >
>At Thu, 27 Mar 2003, anon wrote:
>>
>>At Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Kim507 wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi
>>>
>>>I had 2 m/c so am completely paranoid about this pg
>>>Last week I had my first u/s and knew exactly when I ovulated because I
>>>was on clomid, trigger (HCG) and IUI and baby should have measured 6
>>>weeks 2 or 3 days max
>>>The tech measured the baby at 6 weeks 4 days with a heart rate of 122
>>>I went back today, 1 week later, and the heart rate increased to 155 but
>>>the baby measured 7 weeks 2 days (I initially would not be concerned as
>>>I would expect 7 weeks 3 days, but was concerned compared to last weeks
>>>measurements)
>>>I was very very concerned expecting the baby to measure exactly 1 week
>>>larger at 7 weeks 4 days
>>>Is this normal? Anything to be concerned about
>>>My Dr seemed enthusiastic and said everything looked fine??
>>>
>Personally, I think I would have been more worried about the heartbeat.
>I had asked our tech. when we went in for our 14 week u/s what was
>normal for a hb and he said anything above 120. A hb of 122 seems a
>little slow but I'm no doc.
>Otherwise sounds like everything is fine.
>
>--
>Shelie
>

• Next message: Raichael: "Re: Drawbacks to natural birth?"
• Previous message: Michelle: "Tenderness in abdominal area"
• In reply to: Shelie: "Re: Question about u/s_pls read"
• Next in thread: Shelie: "Re: Question about u/s_pls read"
• Reply: Shelie: "Re: Question about u/s_pls read"