![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Gestational sac too small for viability?From: Julie (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:36:49 -0600 (CST)
Hi. I'm a 32-year-old IVF patient who had a single embryo transferred on 2/26/03. My beta levels have been positive since 3/10 but have not doubled as they should: 12dpt: 129 14dpt: 226 16dpt: 269 20dpt: 713 23dpt: 1,564 At Friday's ultrasound (5w5d pregnant) we saw a gestational sac, but my doctor said it was measuring far behind what it should have been -- it was only 5mm. He said he would be shocked if this pregnancy did not fail. I didn't ask what the size should have been. Can you please tell me? And I'm assuming there's really no chance it will catch up to where it should be at this point, and that I should just wait for a miscarriage -- is this a realistic conclusion? Is there any possibility at all, really, that this is a viable pregnancy? Thanks for your help.
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |