Re: Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Kellie: "Re: acne"
• Previous message: Athena: "Re: IS THIS POSSIBLE?"
• In reply to: Jeanne: "Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?"
• Next in thread: Jeanne: "Re: Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?"
• Reply: Jeanne: "Re: Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?"

At Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Jeanne wrote: >
>Hi, my name is Jeanne and I'm 41 years old. My husband and I have been
>trying to have baby since we got married a year and a half ago (We don't
>have children!) and I have been gone through the infertility treatment
>for one year - it ended up with a laparoscopy surgery through which the
>doctor found my fallopian tubes are almost blocked. So I was suggested
>to go ahead for IVF procedure.
>For achieving better result, my doctor suggested I'd have my fallopian
>tubes burned before IVF to avoid tube pregnancy and the liquid in the
>tube flowing to the uterus to affect the pregnancy. But this suggestion
>means I can never get pregnant naturally (though the chance is
>slight)except through IVF. I was wondering it is necessary to burn the
>tubes before IVF? And what's the possibility for existing tubes affect
>the pregnancy through IVF? Can I achieve a healthy pregnancy while in
>the same time keep my fallopian tubes? I would really like to get second
>opinion before I go on. Thanks,
>
>--
>Jeanne
>

• Next message: Kellie: "Re: acne"
• Previous message: Athena: "Re: IS THIS POSSIBLE?"
• In reply to: Jeanne: "Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?"
• Next in thread: Jeanne: "Re: Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?"
• Reply: Jeanne: "Re: Should I have my fallopian tubes burned before IVF?"