![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Question regarding Ultrasound at 19 weeksFrom: kerry H, RN (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 22 Nov 2002 17:46:51 -0600 (CST)
At Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Jennifer wrote: > >Today I had my first ultrasound of my 19 week old baby. Everything >seemed extremely healthy (thank goodness), and the baby is very active. >During the exam, I asked the technician if we could have the gender >checked. Miraculously she could get behind the baby (from a rear-end >view) and the baby was spread-eagle. From behind, there was nothing >resembling a scrotum, penis or testes. Then she made her way over top >of the baby's bladder and the legs were partially spread. She checked >the gender from that position and still didn't see anything resembling a >penis, scrotum or testes. My husband said he thought he could make out >a slight labia. But with these tests not being 100% accurate, I don't >know what to think. I was so excited knowing I was having a girl, but >I'm afraid to get my hopes up. Since most women say that a small "bump" >(the penis) is viewable from those angles even at 16 weeks, should I >assume I'm having a girl? > >-- >Jennifer > Hi Jennifer, At my 20 weeks scan our baby was spread eagled and I could clearly see testes and a penis. This was proved to be true when our son was born! In our case it was unmissable. Hope this helps some, Best wishes
-- kerry H, RN baby #1 born June 2002
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |