![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Which is more important?From: Alicia M. Lapidus M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Thu, 17 Oct 2002 20:26:37 -0500 (CDT)
At Thu, 17 Oct 2002, Eni wrote: > >I had an U/S which showed the baby to be in the 6 week range. They >didn't give a crown to rump length so I have no way of knowing exactly >how old they are saying the baby measures (nor did they mention it >exactly). I was 7w7d on the day of the u/s. However, the heart beat >was 162 beats per minute which is exactly on for how pregnant I was that >day. > >Is one more important than the other in regards to fetal viability? I've >read that for each you should be +/- a week to be in a healthy range. >Could the length be better measured in later U/S's and become more >accurate? BTW, I'm absolutely sure about my dates. U/S has a margin of error of 7 days.
-- Alicia M. Lapidus M.D. Chief of Staff Obstetrics, Hospital Fernández Assistant Professor, School of Medicine, Barcelo University Vicepresident of Argentine Society of Hypertension in Pregnancy Director Latina Obgyn.net- http\latina.obgyn.net\espanol Buenos Aires Argentina
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |