|
Re: 16 week sonogram picture
From: anonymous@obgyn.net
Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:25:22 -0500 (CDT)
This was a 2D ultrasound. Does that make a difference - are those not
as clear?
At Mon, 14 Oct 2002, samir fouad Aziz MD wrote:
>
>At Mon, 14 Oct 2002, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote:
>>
>>Hi . In a 16 week ultrasound picture my baby's head look very large
>>compared to its body and wider at the top than the bottom of the head.
>>Also, the chin does not seem prominent as compared to other pics I've
>>seen of other people's babies. The neck seems to almost blend with the
>>head with only a slight indentation. Does this seem normal for this
>>stage of pregnancy. Thank you so much for your time.
>
>it is not easy to describe ultrasound picture and judge about
>it,ultrasound takes sections of the body with measurements, as long as
>the measures of head circumference and biparital diameter correspond to
>the date and matches other parts like thoracic and abdominal
>circumferences, there is no need to worry.Was it 2 dimension or 3
>dimention ultrasound.
>
>--
>SAmir Fouad Aziz
>Assist Professor OB.Gyn
>Director Gyn.oncology
>Al-Azhar University-Egypt
>Editorial advisor OBgyn.net(P&B,Gyn.Oncology)
>Consultant Editor the contemporary Who's Who
>This is for teaching purposes only
>
--
Debbi Cosack
|
|