![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Cervical length/funneling questionFrom: samir (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 30 Sep 2002 17:40:10 -0500 (CDT)
At Mon, 30 Sep 2002, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: > >At my 16.5 week ultrasound, my doctor checked my cervical length and it >was 39mm. However, during the exam, it funneled down to 30mm. He was >extremely concerned and explained that this could indicate incompetent >cervix. He had me come back at 18.5 weeks and did another vaginal >ultrasound and there was no funneling and my cervix measured 39mm. Of >course, I was very relieved, but I am still scared. This is my first >pregnancy and I am 34 years old and have been in great health. My >doctor has me scheduled to come in at 21.5 weeks, (next week) and he >will do another measurement. If everything turns out O.K., why would I >have been funneling at 16.5 weeks? He said it looked like I was having a >contraction on the ultrasound monitor. How common is that? How many >doctors check for these things on a regular basis with patients who are >not high risk? Thank you in advance for any insight you can shed. This >is a great website! > >-- >Mindy > i do not check cervix at this time and i would reassure you.
-- SAmir Fouad Aziz Assist Professor OB.Gyn Director Gyn.oncology Al-Azhar University-Egypt Editorial advisor OBgyn.net(P&B,Gyn.Oncology)
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |