|
Re: MISSCARRIED AND STILL PREGNANT-----follow up!!!!
From: SHEILA (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 10 Jun 2002 23:05:34 -0500 (CDT)
At Mon, 10 Jun 2002, William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG wrote:
>
>At Mon, 10 Jun 2002, SHEILA wrote:
>>
this is unlikely because if it were a twin than i would be about 10
weeks pregnant. we would have found something in the sonogram wouldn't
we? i started heavy bleeding on june the first..
>>At Fri, 7 Jun 2002, SHEILA wrote:
>>>
>>hi i'm back again, just to inform you as of whats been going on
>>lately,,my hcg level started at 27 went to 46 started heavy bleeding and
>>bad cramps, pasted alot of products. went back hcg levels droped to 34,
>>repeated in two days hcg level went to 59, repeated in two days hcg
>>levels went to 98, repeated in 3 days and hcg levels came back
>>today,,410..viable pregnancy..sono showed nothing..ok this really
>>bothered me and my doctor..we could not come up with anything..don't
>>know if it is medically possiable. but it sounds like i got pregnant
>>and misscarried at the same time!!!! if the pregnancy can't be seen
>>means it is to early so it can't be from the first pregnancy!!! and that
>>would make up for the hcg levels wouldn't it? well im going wednesday
>>for a nother blood test, friday for another sonogram.. if anyone is
>>able to shed some light on this please respond.. thank you,
>> sheila
>>
>Sheila
>
>How about the early miscarriage of one of the members of a twin
>pregnancy
>
>--
>William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG
>Chairman, Editorial Advisory Board
>Pregnancy and Birth Section
>Private Practice
>New Orleans, La.
>
>*Please understand I can not respond to private emails.
>
>*These comments are for educational purposes only. They are
>not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified
>health care provider. They are not intended to be the start
>of a physician-patient relationship.
>
|
|
![[ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ]](/pregnancy-birth/pnb_forum_L.gif)