PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for May, 2002: Re: Old Wives Tale?

search:

Re: Old Wives Tale?

From: Rachael (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Fri, 31 May 2002 17:37:21 -0500 (CDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: j wang, M.D.: "Re: BBT and AF"
Previous message: Fadette: "Re: Benefits and risks of D&C after MC - doctors, please"
In reply to: Megan: "Old Wives Tale?"
Next in thread: Traci: "Re: Old Wives Tale?"

I've had two girls. First pregnancy, carried high and wide, everyone said "It's a girl" and it was. Second pregnancy, carried very low and everyone said "It's a boy" and it was another girl! I think it has more to do with how our stomach muscles are and how you are built and how the baby is positioned, and less to do with gender.

BTW, my second is named Megan! :)

At Fri, 31 May 2002, Megan wrote: >
>I was just wondering if there is any truth to the carrying
>low=boy/carrying high=girl theory. Because I'm carrying so low, most
>people tell me I'm having a boy.

Next message: j wang, M.D.: "Re: BBT and AF"
Previous message: Fadette: "Re: Benefits and risks of D&C after MC - doctors, please"
In reply to: Megan: "Old Wives Tale?"
Next in thread: Traci: "Re: Old Wives Tale?"

recommended search...

OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 14:00:17 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote