search:

Re: long luteal phase but not pregnant

From: offpill (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Fri, 31 May 2002 05:17:11 -0500 (CDT)


At Wed, 29 May 2002, Julie wrote: >
>Is it possible to have a long luteal phase (20 days) and not be
>pregnant?
>Thx, Jules

Could be a corpus luteum cyst... (not sure of the exact name). But more commonly pregnant.

Not a doctor.






recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:58:13 2008

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com