![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: long luteal phase but not pregnantFrom: offpill (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 31 May 2002 05:17:11 -0500 (CDT)
At Wed, 29 May 2002, Julie wrote: > >Is it possible to have a long luteal phase (20 days) and not be >pregnant? >Thx, Jules Could be a corpus luteum cyst... (not sure of the exact name). But more commonly pregnant. Not a doctor.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:58:13 2008