![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: long luteal phase but not pregnantFrom: offpill (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 31 May 2002 05:17:11 -0500 (CDT)
At Wed, 29 May 2002, Julie wrote: > >Is it possible to have a long luteal phase (20 days) and not be >pregnant? >Thx, Jules Could be a corpus luteum cyst... (not sure of the exact name). But more commonly pregnant. Not a doctor.
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |