PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for May, 2002: Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?

search:

Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?

From: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 6 May 2002 19:29:06 -0500 (CDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Why is there still a risk if there is no complication after multiple d&c?"
Previous message: Garry: "Today's Moderator"
In reply to: Jenny: "Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
Next in thread: Garry: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"

At Mon, 6 May 2002, Jenny wrote: >
>Dr. Almen, I also had 3 d&c and all of them were before 9 weeks. My RE
>told me I should not be at risk for incompetent cervix since all of them
>were at first trimester. Now I'm 12 weeks p/g, so should I worry about
>incompent cervix now or several weeks later? Should I ask my dr. to
>check my cervix length at next appointment? For this p/g, I have had 5
>u/s until now and dr. didn't say anything about placenta previa. At
>this stage of p/g, am I still at risk for placenta previa or have I
>passed the stage where the risk is high?
>Thanks very much for your help!!
>
>At Sun, 5 May 2002, William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG wrote:
>>
>>At Sun, 5 May 2002, Deni wrote:
>>>
>>>38.TTC and 4 losses before 12 weeks.I had two live born before losses?Am
>>>i now more at risk due to three d&c's?Thank you
>>>Deni
>>Deni
>>
>>You are at risk for incompetent cervix and placenta previa
>>
>>--
>>William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG
>>Chairman, Editorial Advisory Board
>>Pregnancy and Birth Section
>>Private Practice
>>New Orleans, La.
>>
>>*Please understand I can not respond to private emails.
>>
>>*These comments are for educational purposes only. They are
>>not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified
>>health care provider. They are not intended to be the start
>>of a physician-patient relationship.
>>

Jenny

I always err on the side of caution. Your risk is elevated, but is still not high

--
William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG
Chairman, Editorial Advisory Board
Pregnancy and Birth Section
Private Practice
New Orleans, La.

*Please understand I can not respond to private emails.

*These comments are for educational purposes only.  They are
not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified
health care provider.  They are not intended to be the start
of a physician-patient relationship.

Next message: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Why is there still a risk if there is no complication after multiple d&c?"
Previous message: Garry: "Today's Moderator"
In reply to: Jenny: "Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
Next in thread: Garry: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"

recommended search...

OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 14:00:12 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote