|
Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?
From: Jenny (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 6 May 2002 09:38:11 -0500 (CDT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Wendy: "Questions"
- Previous message: anonymous: "Re: URGENT HELP NEEDED VERY CONFUSED!!"
- In reply to: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
- Next in thread: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
- Reply: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
- Reply: Garry: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
Dr. Almen, I also had 3 d&c and all of them were before 9 weeks. My RE
told me I should not be at risk for incompetent cervix since all of them
were at first trimester. Now I'm 12 weeks p/g, so should I worry about
incompent cervix now or several weeks later? Should I ask my dr. to
check my cervix length at next appointment? For this p/g, I have had 5
u/s until now and dr. didn't say anything about placenta previa. At
this stage of p/g, am I still at risk for placenta previa or have I
passed the stage where the risk is high?
Thanks very much for your help!!
At Sun, 5 May 2002, William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG wrote:
>
>At Sun, 5 May 2002, Deni wrote:
>>
>>38.TTC and 4 losses before 12 weeks.I had two live born before losses?Am
>>i now more at risk due to three d&c's?Thank you
>>Deni
>Deni
>
>You are at risk for incompetent cervix and placenta previa
>
>--
>William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG
>Chairman, Editorial Advisory Board
>Pregnancy and Birth Section
>Private Practice
>New Orleans, La.
>
>*Please understand I can not respond to private emails.
>
>*These comments are for educational purposes only. They are
>not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified
>health care provider. They are not intended to be the start
>of a physician-patient relationship.
>
- Next message: Wendy: "Questions"
- Previous message: anonymous: "Re: URGENT HELP NEEDED VERY CONFUSED!!"
- In reply to: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
- Next in thread: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
- Reply: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
- Reply: Garry: "Re: Dr., I also had 3 d&c but my RE said otherwise! Re: 3 d&c's..more at risk of incompetent cervix?"
|
|
![[ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ]](/pregnancy-birth/pnb_forum_L.gif)