PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for March, 2002: Re: Due date confusion

search:

Re: Due date confusion

From: Amber (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 14 Mar 2002 11:45:08 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Toshia: "Bicornuate Uterus Need Reassurance"
Previous message: Jennifer: "aspirin"
In reply to: anon..: "Due date confusion"
Next in thread: anon: "Re: Due date confusion"
Reply: anon: "Re: Due date confusion"

2001 or 2002 because you should have had that baby??? I am confused by your post. At Thu, 14 Mar 2002, anon.. wrote: >
>Had dr. appt yesterday and he did u/s.
>measurements came back that the baby is actually
>measuring 2 weeks smaller than what I thought I should
>be. I calculated my lmp was 10/5/01. When I had my first
>u/s , she said the baby was 6 weeks 3 days and put my due date at
>July 22, 2001. My new edd is july 27,2001. Is first one more accurate
>than 5 month u/s? So, does that make me 22 weeks along?
>Please answer my confusion.

--
Amber

Next message: Toshia: "Bicornuate Uterus Need Reassurance"
Previous message: Jennifer: "aspirin"
In reply to: anon..: "Due date confusion"
Next in thread: anon: "Re: Due date confusion"
Reply: anon: "Re: Due date confusion"

recommended search...

OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 13:58:23 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote