Re: 40 weeks

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Jane: "Re: Follow up Q for Jane - Re: Triple Screen Vs. Quad Screen"
• Previous message: almost30: "Re: implantation after ovulation timeframe"
• In reply to: Joanne: "40 weeks"

At Sat, 9 Mar 2002, Joanne wrote: >
>I am 40 weeks, only 1cm, and only 50%effaced. My fear is having to be
>induced, b/c my practice waits until 42.0 to even think about
>this.....and I am very petite/small boned, and the baby was (of course
>estimated) at 7lbs 11 days ago. My ob laughed and said she doesn't see
>me going that long at all, since last week I was barely effaced and
>1/2cm - she said a show of change is what's important, and the head is
>in position. BUT, from reading the archives, it seems as if I could
>walk around like this for WEEKS w/ nothing happening! Should she not
>have called my outlook "very favorable?" I'm too small to give birth to
>a huge baby!

• Next message: Jane: "Re: Follow up Q for Jane - Re: Triple Screen Vs. Quad Screen"
• Previous message: almost30: "Re: implantation after ovulation timeframe"
• In reply to: Joanne: "40 weeks"