PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for February, 2002: Re: ladies, found this site on miscarriage, plus statistic question for DR

search:

Re: ladies, found this site on miscarriage, plus statistic question for DR

From: R. Daniel Braun, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 28 Feb 2002 20:17:15 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Ginger: "30 wks & strange anonymous@obgyn.net PLEASE HELP!"
Previous message: R. Daniel Braun, MD: "Re: dropping progesterone levels in early pregnancy"
In reply to: anonymous: "ladies, found this site on miscarriage, plus statistic question for DR"

At Thu, 28 Feb 2002, anonymous wrote: >
>http://brook006.mc.duke.edu/mc/miscarriage.html
>
>It has some interesting technical/medical info and discusses some of the
>more controversial and recent theroies surrounding miscarriage, so might
>be of interest to women here who are researching this.
>
>It had the following quote from an MD, which addresses the statistics we
>all cling to regarding risk of miscarriage once fetal heart rate is
>seen. I'd be interested to know if the doctors here agree.
>
>"Let me reassure you that your experience is VERY common. I see similar
>cases every month in my practice. The problem is that experience with
>the
>vaginal probe ultrasound is very limited, and to extrapolate the
>presence of fetal cardiac activity on vaginal probe ultrasound to
>previous reassuring
>statistics about discenment of cardiac activity by abdominal ultrasound
>(doppler) or earlier auditory auscultation (stethescope) are not valid.
>Most
>spontaneous abs occur prior to the 12th week, and a very short time ago,
>cardiac activity was not discernable prior to the 12th week with any
>degree
>of regularity, so the common statement was "Once we hear the fetal heart
>we don't worry about miscarriage." But now we are using a more sensitive
>technology and this trueism will not hold up."

Yes and No. Studies have been done with the newer technology and the data seems to hold. The original studies were done with transad½ominal ultrasound which usually detects a fetal heart by 6 weeks. The vaginal probe only improves that by 3-5 days.

Also, he continued to say that there were studies showing that the rate of recurrent SAB was increased if conception occurred in less than 4 months after the loss. I haven't seen those studies?????????? He didn't say where they were either.

--
R.Daniel Braun, MD  FACOG   FOG
**Note:  Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only
and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship.
This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to
consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options
and/or interventions.

**Private emails cannot be entertained due to time constraints,
consequently no private emails will receive a response.

**Thank you for your understanding ;-)

Next message: Ginger: "30 wks & strange anonymous@obgyn.net PLEASE HELP!"
Previous message: R. Daniel Braun, MD: "Re: dropping progesterone levels in early pregnancy"
In reply to: anonymous: "ladies, found this site on miscarriage, plus statistic question for DR"

recommended search...

OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 13:57:23 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote