Re: What now (any doctors please)

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: kimberly: "what do you think?"
• Previous message: Kirsty: "Re: What are the possible reasons for a lack of EWCM?"
• In reply to: Lynn D. Montgomery, MD: "Re: What now (any doctors please)"

Thank you

At Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Lynn D. Montgomery, MD wrote: >
>At Wed, 6 Feb 2002, Nikki wrote:
>>
>>Hi I am a bit confused now, I had a AF 06/01 witch lasted the 7 days as
>>normal but it was very watery and no clots, I had a lot of Cm from about
>>day 9 right through to the before my next AF day 26 well I had sore
>>breasts and for the first time in ages too so I sort of expected my
>>AF.took a PG test about day 20 came back negative, well on day 28 I
>>started Af again (AAAH) which is a first for me as I am never regular
>>except when on norithisterone.. well this Af is very very light with no
>>clots and is light not exactly red and started brownish and seems to be
>>going back to that. still have sore breasts, what could this be is this
>>just a failed AF and do I need to go back onto hormones again.
>>
>>I have been on Norethisterone on days 19-26 for three months to regulate
>>my cycle so this is the first one started with out Norethisterone.
>>
>>Any advice would be great,,
>>
>>thanks in advance
>>Nikki
>
>Nikki,
>Given that this is a rather new experience for you to have regular
>cycles, my first impression is that this is your cycle. I would want to
>follow a few more cycles and see how they behave. You can also chart
>with temp charts to see if and when you are ovulating...
>Lynn
>
>--
>Lynn D. Montgomery, MD
>Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine
>Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center
>Missoula, Montana
>
>**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.
>
>**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response.
>
>**Thank you for your understanding ;-)
>

• Next message: kimberly: "what do you think?"
• Previous message: Kirsty: "Re: What are the possible reasons for a lack of EWCM?"
• In reply to: Lynn D. Montgomery, MD: "Re: What now (any doctors please)"