Re: U/S and beta questions-quick followup
From: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Sun, 30 Dec 2001 15:10:31 -0600 (CST)
Now I'm confused too. Doesn't make any sense as presented.
Dr. M
At Sun, 30 Dec 2001, danielle wrote:
>
>when we had the U/S on 12/17 the tech pointed to a worm shaped thing and
>said that looked like the baby and in center of it there was a very tiny
>flashing light,she said she thought that was heart beat. She also
>pointed to a round thing that she said was a yolk sac. When I asked my
>dr. about how I could only be 4.5 weeks but we clearly saw (what we
>thought) was a baby and heart beat,all she said was no, it wasn't. Could
>somehow whatever report she is reading be not as detailed as what we saw
>live,b/c she wasn't there?Just confused.
>
>At Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. wrote:
>>
>>Second question first - it's normal.
>>
>>With respect to the sono, IF you had a 26 day cycle this time, it should
>>have been further than 4.5 weeks but prior to seeing the fetus, dating
>>the pregnancy is not very accurate so don't give up hope. The betas
>>look fine.
>>
>>Hope this helps and write back anytime for more information.
>>
>>Dr. M
>>
>>At Sun, 30 Dec 2001, danielle wrote:
>>>
>>>LMP was 11/1/01,usually have 26 day cycles. Tested - using early ept
>>>/??
>>
>>--
>>Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS
>>Great Neck, New York
>>
>>**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only
>>and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship.
>>This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to
>>consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options
>>and/or interventions.
>>
>>**Private emails cannot be entertained due to time constraints,
>>consequently no private emails will receive a response.
>>
>>**Thank you for your understanding.
>>
>>Please be aware that all e-mail on this forum is archived and can be viewed at
>>http://forums.obgyn.net/womens-health,
>>http://forums.obgyn.net/pregnancy-birth or
>>http://forums.obgyn.net/young-women
>>and is accessible to anybody on the
>>internet including internet search engines. This should be taken into
>>consideration before sending postings of a personal or confidential nature.
>>
--
Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS
Great Neck, New York
**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only
and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship.
This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to
consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options
and/or interventions.
**Private emails cannot be entertained due to time constraints,
consequently no private emails will receive a response.
**Thank you for your understanding.
Please be aware that all e-mail on this forum is archived and can be viewed at
http://forums.obgyn.net/womens-health,
http://forums.obgyn.net/pregnancy-birth or
http://forums.obgyn.net/young-women
and is accessible to anybody on the
internet including internet search engines. This should be taken into
consideration before sending postings of a personal or confidential nature.