![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: 16 weeks vs. 20 week u/sFrom: Lynn D. Montgomery, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 26 Dec 2001 13:52:48 -0600 (CST)
At Wed, 26 Dec 2001, Paula wrote: > >Is a Level 3 u/s a good alternative is someone gets a positive AFP and >doesn't want to do an u/s? *Huh?
> *The level issue is gone. Currently, an ultrasound done by a specialist in Maternal-Fetal Medicine is referred to as a "targeted ultrasound".
> *A targeted ultrasound done at 16 weeks is one good means of determining issues regarding fetal well-being. As to its precision, that depends on the individual performing the ultrasound.
> *None that I can recall, but I am sure it happens, especially when the scans are done first by someone less skilled, followed by one done later by a specialist in Maternal-Fetal Medicine... Lynn
-- Lynn D. Montgomery, MD Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center Missoula, Montana
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |