|
Re: Implantation ? anovulatory...Plz reply...very curious
From: anonymous (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Wed, 31 Oct 2001 11:03:08 -0600 (CST)
Not a doctor, but I respectfully disagree. If your temps continue to
remain above 98.0, I would suggest that your temp rise followed the 97.7
temp, (with coverline established at 97.8) and the earlier 98.2 temp in
your cycle is an aberration. Besides which, it doesn't even fall in the
"previous 6 temperatures" rule, and the sustained rise (.2 above
coverline) is enough to establish temp rise by every source I seen
regarding bbts.
At Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Lynn D. Montgomery, MD wrote:
>
>At Wed, 31 Oct 2001, Wanda wrote:
>>
>>Does this look anovulatory / implantation??
>>Previous cycle coverline is 97.5 and very little bleeding during periods
>>with day 1…brown spotting, day 2 little blood with some mucous, day
>>3…spotting. Only thick white cervical mucous after that with vaginal
>>opening very tight.
>>This is the temps of the new cycle keeping the light bleeding as day 1
>>
>>97.8 , 97.3, 97.9, 97.8, 98.2, 97.6, 97.5, 97.6, 97.7, 97.8, 97.7, 98.0,
>>98.3, 98.5, 98.4 , 98.4
>>
>>All opinions are appreciated thnx
>
>Thus far, the temps do not appear "biphasic". In other words, there is
>no change yet that I would correlate with ovulation...
>Lynn
>
>--
>Lynn D. Montgomery, MD
>Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine
>Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center
>Missoula, Montana
>
>**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions.
>
>**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response.
>
>**Thank you for your understanding ;-)
>
|
|
![[ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ]](/pregnancy-birth/pnb_forum_L.gif)