![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: 3 m/c's, odds?From: William McIntosh, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 2 Oct 2001 12:24:45 -0500 (CDT)
At Tue, 2 Oct 2001, Becky wrote: > >I am 32 and had 3 m/c's. We had a karyotype done and it was normal. So, >I realize that 3 m/c's at my age is abnormal. Would you say that based >on the odds, I should be able to finally carry a pregnancy to term since >there were no findings from the reproductive endocrinologist? > >Also, since my karyotype was normal, are there any other enviromental or >situational factors that would cause a chromosomal abnormality rather >than it just being a fluke? > >Thanks, >Becky the last stats that I saw indicate that between 50 and 60% of the next pregnancies are carried to term in this situation, but that is based on discovery after the first missed period, not like now when we can find them so early. Environmental factors can certainly cause miscarriage, but for something to cause 3 in a row, it would have to be a profound insult, one that would be affecting the mother's health as well most likely.
-- William D. McIntosh, MD, FACOG
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |