![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 2ND REPOST PLEASE ANSWERFrom: Lynn D. Montgomery, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 5 Sep 2001 09:10:56 -0500 (CDT)
At Wed, 5 Sep 2001, michelleg wrote: > >I just came home from an ultrasound to see if I am shortening in the >cervix, the length was 2.7 centimeters. > >He has me on bedrest because I thought I lost my mucous plug. Do you >think the 2.7 is bad? Good? I >am 28 weeks and worried about preterm labor. What would you do with you >patient? > >I have one child already, born at 35 weeks and I have had a placental >tear that caused hemorraghe at > 17 weeks. > > Baby looks to be 3 pds already.. Thanks for your answers. > > -- michelleg > > -- > michelleg > >-- >michelleg > Michelleg, Your cervical length is somewhat non-informatory at 28 weeks because I don't have another cervical length of you earlier in pregnancy. Critical cervical length tends to be around 2.5 cm, but this is not an absolute. However, with your history, I would agree with the bedrest... Lynn
-- Lynn D. Montgomery, MD Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center Missoula, Montana
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:45:08 2008