Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Vaso: "spotting"
• Previous message: cath: "Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?"
• In reply to: cath: "Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?"
• Next in thread: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?"

--
Allyson

At Sat, 11 Aug 2001, cath wrote:
>
>I second this question! I've also heard this and read it repeatedly, but
>can't quite find an answer as to why this might be so.
>
>At Sat, 11 Aug 2001, Kristi wrote:
>>
>>I just experienced a very early miscarriage.  I was 5 weeks and started
>>spotting and then bleeding.  The day after the heavy bleeding my hCG was
>>down to 6 and my ultrasound showed no signs of pregnancy remaining.  This
>>could have been a "chemical pregnancy" but at this point, I just dont
>>know.
>>I have heard and read that the first few months following a miscarriage,
>>a woman is more fertile due to certain hormonal situations.  Could
>>someone shed some light on this and if it is true...then why exactly!
>>
>>Thank you!
>>Jennifer

• Next message: Vaso: "spotting"
• Previous message: cath: "Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?"
• In reply to: cath: "Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?"
• Next in thread: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Increased Fertility following very early miscarriage?? If so, why?"