|
high progesterone FOLLOW UP Q ?MISSED
From: anonymous@obgyn.net
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 09:15:27 -0500 (CDT)
Hi, it looks like this q may have been missed, any insight appreciated..
At Tue, 24 Jul 2001, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote:
>
>Thankyou dr,
>I have one further question. You state that although I spotted I could
>indeed be pregnant. Well, I did have a little increased bleeding
>yesterday for an hour or two. Since then the flow has dwindled to a
>very light flow. This is quite unlike any period I have had before.
>Could I still be pg if the flow was increased? or does it sound like a
>very early m/c? I know that it is impossible to say over the net, but
>the odds on such an occurance are appreciated.
>Thankyou for your time.
>
>>At Mon, 23 Jul 2001, jwang, M.D. wrote:
>>>
>>>24 is considered the normal upper limit for the luteal phase. Although
>>>you are spotting, you could be pregnant. A higher progest. is OK as
>>>well.
>>>
>>>At Mon, 23 Jul 2001, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote:
>>>>
>>>>hello,
>>>>
>>>>i hope that you can help me answer this question. The server still
>>>>seems to be down so I can't do a search.
>>>>
>>>>What is the normal non pregnant range for leutal phase progesterone?
>>>>I have looked elsewhere on the net and in the library, and all the info
>>>>I have found suggests below 28.
>>>>
>>>>I rang my MD, and my level is 37.8. I have now started to bleed alittle
>>>>more heavily, so perhaps am not pg. I thought that I was this month.
>>>>
>>>>Does the above level suggest that I was pg and m/c. I rang my dr and he
>>>>said that it could, or could not?
>>>>
>>>>Is there a problem with having a high progesterone, when ttc?
>>>>
>>>>Thankyou so much, I am just trying to see the whole picture,
>>>
>>>--
>>>J Wang, M.D
>>>Assitant Clinical Prof.
>>>Tufts University School of Medicine
>>>
>>>statements are informational only and should not constitute a medical plan or treatment recommendation.
>>>
|
|
![[ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ]](/pregnancy-birth/pnb_forum_L.gif)