|
FOLLOW UP Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels
From: anonymous@obgyn.net
Sat, 30 Jun 2001 16:21:44 -0500 (CDT)
- Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
- Next message: Jen: "Belly Casting"
- Previous message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: 33 weeks with a cold"
- In reply to: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: SECOND Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels"
- Next in thread: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: FOLLOW UP Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels"
- Reply: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: FOLLOW UP Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels"
Thankyoufor your reply,
I am a little confused, does this mean that my results are abnormal
afterall?
I had a very faint + HPT two months ago, but then recieved my menses and
a - hpt a few days later. We have been off the pill for 3 months, have
no other gynae history, I feel that there is something wrong, therefore
had these tests. Based on these details, do you think they sound
abnormal?
Could they be the reason why I had a chemical pg?
I understand that you can't diagnose etc, but would really appreciate
your opinion.
thankyou (fsh 5.4, lh 3.0)
At Sat, 30 Jun 2001, William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG wrote:
>
>At Sat, 30 Jun 2001, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote:
>>
>>Hello,
>>Thankyou for the reassurance, I was led to believe that the fsh should
>>not be doulble the lh, is that true? I am asking as, mine is almost
>>double. I know this is for education purposes, but you say that it is
>>'pretty' normal, does this suggest that it is at the unnacceptable side
>>of normal?
>>
>>thankyou for your help,
>>
>Anon
>
>That is true, but it you must evaluate the lab values in relationship to
>whatever else is going on clinically.
>
>--
>William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG
>Editorial Advisor-Pregnancy and Birth
>Private Practice
>New Orleans, La.
>
>*Please understand I can not respond to private emails.
>
>*These comments are for educational purposes only. They are
>not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified
>health care provider. They are not intended to be the start
>of a physician-patient relationship.
>
- Next message: Jen: "Belly Casting"
- Previous message: anonymous@obgyn.net: "Re: 33 weeks with a cold"
- In reply to: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: SECOND Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels"
- Next in thread: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: FOLLOW UP Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels"
- Reply: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: FOLLOW UP Q For dr in reply to fsh, lh and progesterone levels"
|
|
![[ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ]](/pregnancy-birth/pnb_forum_L.gif)