![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Doc questionFrom: M. Kelly Shanahan, MD, (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 26 May 2001 13:31:42 -0500 (CDT)
At Fri, 25 May 2001, Caroline wrote: > >Thanks in advance for your advice. My ob-gyn told me the pathology >results from my D&C were inconclusive, so we both assumed my miscarriage >was caused by a hormonal problem. I then went to a maternal-fetal >specialist who diagnosed a luteal phase defect and put me on Serophene. >Then, much to my (and my ob's) surprise, the cells DID grow out and we >were told it was a Trisomy 22 chromosomal defect that caused the >miscarriage. > >SO ... my question ... Do I still need to be treated for the hormonal >problem even though that's not what caused my miscarriage? not unless luteal phase defect was diagnosed by approprite testing (progesterone levels and endometrial biopsy in a non-pregnant ovulatory cycle)
Can that
>alone cause another miscarriage? yes
How do I know for sure whether I have a
>luteal phase defect? see above
(The doctor did an endometrial biopsy but maybe I
>should get a second opinion--not sure.)
an extra copy of chromosome 22 (3 instead of the normal 2 copies)
>
-- M. Kelly Shanahan, MD, FACOG South Lake Tahoe, CA
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:34:24 2008