![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Conception, Blood tests, & UltrasoundFrom: Scott (anonymous@obgyn.net)Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:02:09 -0500 (CDT)
At Thu, 26 Apr 2001, Scott wrote: > >My question concerns the possible miscarriage of my wifes pregnancy. The >only day she could have conceived was Mar 28/29. The first day of LMP >was March 10.This should make her 6 1/2 weeks, right? well the >ultrasound yesterday, apr 25, showed a very small little round something >that the doc. dated at maybe 4-4 1/2 weeks. After that the doctor >mentioned miscarriage and non-growing about 5 times. She also changed >her mind about scheduling the 18 week diagnostic ultrasound, said we >should hold off eventhough prior to the ultrasound she wanted to go >ahead and schedule it. She then wanted to do a bloodwork up to test HGC >levels and my wife must go back Fri for the second test. Our dates are >not off, though the doc. mentioned that. Is this all as ominous as I >think? I couldn't ask the doc. these questions with my wife there, it >would have wrecked her. At 6 1/2 weeks, shouldn't there have been >atleast something visible, other than what we saw? >Thanks in advance, >Scott Well we got back the numbers and at 6w4d from LMP, HCGh66, then 6w6d from LMP, HCG411. This is right on the 66% range that is quoted all over this forum. But it still does not explain the lack of yoke sac and fetal pole. She has an appointment friday for another ultrasound. My question is, with a pregnancy that forms a sac, but no embryo, do the hcg levels continue to rise eventhough there is no embryo/fetus? And if so for how long? Thanks, Scott
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |