![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 29 weeks pregnant with cervical length of 1.7 cmFrom: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 24 Mar 2001 19:26:00 -0600 (CST)
At Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Rita wrote: > >I am 29 weeks pregnant and have been on bedrest for the past four months >because I have a third degree uterine prolapse (I have a pessary in for >that). Ten days ago my ultrasound cervical length measurement was 2.7 >cm (2.4 cm with val salva). Three days ago it was checked again and it >was 1.75 cm (no val salva was done this time). My doctor was not in >town this week, but her associate said I was okay for now with continued >bedrest, because I showed no funneling. They're rechecking with another >transvaginal ultrasound this coming week. Do you think any other >intervention is necessary at this time? (I was told that I am at high >risk of preterm labor and further cervical thinning may lead to >hospitalization with mag sulfate and steroidal therapy for the duration >of my pregnancy.) Rita This is certainly bothersome shortening. I would stay as quiet as possible and be sure to call with any changes. Good Luck
-- William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG Editorial Advisor-Pregnancy and Birth Private Practice New Orleans, La.
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:30:51 2008