![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: no fetal pole seen with ectopic after methotrexate,thank youFrom: alison (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 27 Feb 2001 18:24:16 -0600 (CST)
At Tue, 27 Feb 2001, William McIntosh, MD wrote: > >At Tue, 27 Feb 2001, alison wrote: >> >>I just had a vag.ultrasound today, and they finally found an ectopic >>fibrosia on my right side measuring 1 cm. Dated with my LMP I received >>methotrexate at 9 weeks. It has been 2 and a half weeks since the >>methotrexate. My last HCG a week ago was 231.They said that there was >>no fetal pole. Does this mean that they couldn't see one, because it >>was too early or destoryed by the methotrexate, or does it mean that >>there was never a fetus? Even if there was no fetus was there >>fertilization? I am going crazy wondering if there was ever a fetus or >>not. I just need to know what your feelings are on the matter. > >Many, if not most, ectopics never develop a fetus, as the area simply >cannot support a normal pregnancy. However, there was a fertilization >that implanted in the wrong spot, putting your life at risk. The >methotrexate appears to have protected you from the possible >consequences of the ectopic. > >Dr. McIntosh, thank you so much for your reply. This really helped with my peace of mind. I appreciate your taking the time to answer my questions. Alison >-- >William D. McIntosh, MD, FACOG > >This is for educational purposes only, and is not a substitute >for consultation and examination by a licensed medical professional. >
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |