![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
LMP vs. ovulation dateFrom: Sara (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:33:38 -0600 (CST)
I've used the Fertility Awareness method (temperature & mucus charting) to get pregnant both times I've been pregnant. I know when I ovulated, or rather I know when my temperature went up. Both times it was day 18. My cycles varied from 29-36 days long. Both times I gave this information to my medical provider (once a OB, once a homebirth midwife). Both times they ignored the ovulation information and gave me a due date based on the LMP date. Is there any good reason for this? The first time I figured I was just being picky so I didn't bother the doctor about it. (I got a 1st trimester ultrasound that matched right up with what I said the date was.) But the second time I realized that those two days might make the difference between being induced or not (and in retrospect, it did). I didn't get an ultrasound that time, but talked the midwife into "letting" me go 2 days over what she said the due date was. I had the baby at 41 weeks 6 days. The homebirth didn't work out, so I'm with an OB next time around. He said that he would go by the LMP date as well. Is there a good reason for this? I thought that the ovulation date information from the temperature chart was very trustworthy, more so than LMP.
-- Sara
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:26:41 2008