![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Due dateFrom: Kelly Shanahan, MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 6 Jan 2001 00:35:31 -0600 (CST)
At Fri, 5 Jan 2001, Angela wrote: > >I am a little concerened about my OBGYN. I had a baby in March of 2000. >My 'First' period since she was born was July 1, 2000. The period only >lasted a day and was very light. I went to the doctor in November and >they determined I was pregnant again. They ordered an ultrasound and at >that time it said I was 29 weeks pregnant. I spoke with a doctor there >and they said my due date per the ultrasound was Feb. 4th. When I met >with the OBGYN she said my due date is April 11th. I have only been to >see her once since then, since she has a demanding case load and I feel >like I am not getting good prenatal care. The Dr. that delivered my >baby is out on leave for a year so, I went to a new Dr.'s office. I >don't want to question, my Dr.'s ability, but I think 9 weeks difference >is huge. The Dr. that saw me and ordered the X-ray was sure my due >date is Feb. 4th. And this Dr. who is the OBGYN is determined the due >date is April 11th. Any suggestions? > >Thanks, > >-- >Angela > Since you realy have no clue as to when your last period was, and didn't even know you were pregnant for quite a while, the ultrasound should be used to determine your due date -- at 29 weeks, there is a fairly large range of error of the ultrasound, however, almost 3 weeks. For your sake and that of yoru unborn baby, you MUST get good prenatal care -- if you do not like your current doctor, go to another one!!
-- M. Kelly Shanahan, MD S. Lake Tahoe, CA
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |