search:

Re: PREGNANCY-BIRTH digest 880

From: Dr. (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 04 Dec 2000 11:38:21 -0600


Of necessity my address has had to change to swelt@iwon.com

Sorry for the inconvenience

--
Selman I. Welt, M.D.

At 06:03 PM 8/30/00 -0500, you wrote: > PREGNANCY-BIRTH Digest 880 > >Topics covered in this issue include: > > 1) Re: With regards to Dr. Lynn Montgomery's response[Re: effects of marihuana] > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 2) Re: What is it? > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 3) RE: Am I hurting the baby? > by Esmeralda Gallegos <EGallegos@fossil.com> > 4) Re: Braxton Hicks > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 5) Help regarding IUGR?? > by ncypantz@aol.com (Nancy) > 6) Re: Vanishing Twin? > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 7) Surgery: Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy > by duchessoferat@esatclear.ie (D.O'Brien) > 8) Re: Help regarding IUGR?? > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 9) Re: Surgery: Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 10) 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test) > by anonmom@anon.net (Ann) > 11) Re: BH Contractions > by schmoo897@yahoo.com (Janna) > 12) Drunk before finding out about pregnancy > by karamichelle@dellnet.com (Kara) > 13) Tubal Ligation Failure Question > by emk@vircomsolutions.com (EMK) > 14) repeated miscarriage and use of prometrium > by jrardin@wyoming.com (Jennifer Rardin) > 15) Re: Am I hurting the baby? > by Tonja.Brossette@obgyn.net (Tonja Brossette) > 16) Re: Drunk before finding out about pregnancy > by Tonja.Brossette@obgyn.net (Tonja Brossette) > 17) Re: 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test) > by Tonja.Brossette@obgyn.net (Tonja Brossette) > 18) First Trimester Question > by Scarcelli@AOL.COM (Cindy) > 19) Re: 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test) > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > 20) Re: Drunk before finding out about pregnancy > by lmontgomery@communitymed.org (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:57:37 -0500 (CDT) >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: With regards to Dr. Lynn Montgomery's response[Re: effects of marihuana] >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, J wrote: >> >>The experimental drug for psoriasis is made by a company called Biogen >>Inc...the drug is called Amevive. >>Her dermatologist, who is conducting the study, told her that there >>isn't anything to worry about. >>She wants to have an amniocentesis done regardless of what he >>said...what exactly can the amnio tell her....and what doesn't it tell >>her about the health of the fetus? >> >>Thank you for responding. >>Jacqueline > >Jacqueline, >She is certainly entitled to have an amniocentesis. I would have her >request the data on the medication. I have checked my sources and >cannot find the med-this is unusual because the sources I have are >usually very up to date. If the medication is being used on humans, >experimental or not, there are several levels of trials the medication >must undergo prior to human use-have your friend get that data. > >The problem with the amnio is the fact that it only shows whether or not >the chromosomes are normal or not. What it doesn't show are the more >common problems that occur secondary to medications-deformities. She >should make sure that she asks for a targeted ultrasound from a >specialist in obstetric ultrasound (either a maternal-fetal specialist >or a Radiologist with special experience in obstetric scans)... >Lynn >> >>At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Lynn D. Montgomery, MD wrote: >>> >>>At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, J wrote: >>>> >>>>Hello >>>> >>>>My sister found out yesterday that she is 10 weeks pregnant...it was a >>>>great shock because she had been taking an experimental drug for >>>>psoriasis and apparently the baby was conceived 1 week after her last >>>>dose of the meds...but her test results for the past few months showed >>>>negative for pregnancy! >>>> >>>>Anyway, she is indeed pregnant...she had some concerns about this drug >>>>(Amevive)...but her dermatologist assured her it wouldn't harm the fetus >>>>(she hasn't taken any since 1 week before conception). >>>> >>>>Her anxiety comes mainly in the form of her husband...he likes to smoke >>>>marihuana (no other drugs) and she is now concerned about the effects of >>>>his smoking on the fetus...my sister is not exposed and hasn't been >>>>exposed to the secondhand smoke! >>>> >>>>Can there be any developmental or birth defects caused from a father who >>>>smokes this stuff? >>>> >>>>Thanks for any advice! >>>> >>>>-- >>>>J >>>> >>>J, >>>I checked on the "Amevive". I am wondering about the spelling because I >>>cannot find anything on it. There is no evidence that paternal usage of >>>marijuana causes any reproductive problems or congenital >>>abnormalities... >>>Lynn >>> >>>-- >>>Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >>>Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >>>Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >>>Missoula, Montana >>> >>>**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. >>> >>>**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. >>> >>>**Thank you for your understanding ;-) >>> > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 14:59:41 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: What is it? >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: >> >>I am noticing that I am having this jelly like stuff that is coming from >>my vagina It looks like mucus or ablood clot but white. What is this? > >Minormia, >I am assuming that you are pregnant. It is normal to have an increase >in vaginal discharge during pregnancy. However, if the amount is >significantly greater than the nonpregnant state, I would certainly >contact your obstetric care provider, especially if there is an blood >contained... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:00:49 -0500 >------------------------------ >From: Esmeralda <anonymous@obgyn.net> >To: "'anonymous@obgyn.net'" <anonymous@obgyn.net> >Subject: RE: Am I hurting the baby? >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="iso-8859-1" > >Yes, I want to be sure it's a boy. > >-----Original Message----- >From: anonymous@obgyn.net [mailto:anonymous@obgyn.net >Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:46 PM >To: Multiple recipients of list PREGNANCY-BIRTH >Subject: Re: Am I hurting the baby? > >Any time someone does something against your will that hurts you either >physically or emotionally, it is NOT okay. If you've asked your husband >to stop the rough horseplay, explained that it hurts, etc. and he has >ignored your wishes, it might be time to get serious with him and/or >seek some counseling. Furthermore, a 33-week pregnant mother being >pushed off of a bed is NOT okay under any circumstances and by all >means, this behavior needs to stop ***immediately.*** Your baby's most >likely okay physically as he's well protected in there, but if for >nothing other than respect for his wife and unborn child, your husband >needs to comply with your wishes and behave appropriately. If you're >concerned about injury to your baby, don't hesitate to mention it to >your doctor. > >Intercourse should be fine unless you've been advised otherwise by a >medical caregiver or unless it results in regular contractions. As far >as the sono, most doctors won't do a sono this late in the game simply >for the purpose of determining sex, but if you feel comfortable asking, >you don't have much to lose. > >I would be more concerned with the other issue, frankly. I'm sure your >husband means no harm to you or your baby, but when his wife is reduced >to tears after "play," it's time to stop. > >Good luck to you... > >Tonja > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: >> >>I wanted to ask, my husband i sometimes very tuff he plays to tuff, and >>sometimes pushes me around or pushes me off the bed but very ruff, and >>that hurts my feelings so i start crying, and i cry for ever, could the >>baby be hurt that way, or is it okay that he does that? and is having >>intercourse with him okay this far along that i am? I wanted to ask too, >>i want to know if i am having a boy they had told me at the hopital that >>it was a boy but could i ask my doctor for a sono done, or is it to late >>i will be 33 weeks when i go back. > >-- >Tonja Brossette >OBGYN.net Coordinator >Pregnancy & Birth >tonja.brossette@obgyn.net > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:01:18 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Braxton Hicks >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Michele wrote: >> >>When do BH contractions usually start? Yesterday, I was really surprised >>when my lower abdomen got all tight and hard. Was this a BH? If not, >>what else could it be? I'm 17 weeks along and have been feeling alot of >>little flutters. ( : > >Michele, >Could have been a BH contraction or could have been gas... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:04:16 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Nancy) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Help regarding IUGR?? >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >I am 22.5 wks pg and my baby has intrauterine growth retardation, >measuring around 18-19 wks. I have a bicornuate uterus and had bleeding >at 11 wks. I was also on progesterone suppositories because my level >was low. I have had every test -amnio, cystic fibrosis, cmv, ana, >antiphospholipid antibodies, and they have all come back normal. The >baby is behind symmetrically which means the head isn't growing very >well. My doctor says the prognosis is poor and suggests induction. I >went today for a final u/s, and the heart is still beating and the baby >grew. I am supposed to go in for induction, but am afraid I'm giving up >too easily. Anyone else with similar experience? I feel I need more >info. Please help!! > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:07:39 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Vanishing Twin? >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Melinda wrote: >> >>I posted earlier about being 7.4 weeks pregnant. The baby has a >>heartbeat but my uterus has a pool of blood plus more blood and some >>clots throughout. I am not having any miscarriage symptoms. My doc >>said the pool was a placenta. I'm leary with that because I did Clomid >>and ultrasounds for timed HCG and had one 20mm follicle. One thing I >>failed to mention in my last post was that my doctor pointed out the >>good, solid implantation attachment. (One respondent questioned >>placenta detachment.) >> >>My questions: >> >>1. With seeing only one mature follicle, could I have possibly released >>two eggs? > >With only one follicle on scan before ovulation, it is unlikely that you >ovulated two eggs. The fertilized egg could have divided, creating two >embryos. >> >>2. Looking at other ultrasounds of vanishing twins on the internet, >>they do not have a uterus full of blood, just a placenta getting >>smaller. Why would mine be a pool of blood instead of a formed >>placenta? Is this normal? > >It can be normal, depending on when the scan is done in relation to the >loss of the twin. >> >>3. I've run across brief suggestions that vanishing twin syndrome is a >>higher risk for cerebral palsey. Any thoughts? > >Probably not this early in pregnancy. This suggestion is related to a >twin lost later in the pregnancy. There are probably many pregnancies >that begin as a twin gestation. I have heard one suggestion of as many >as 40% of pregnancies begin as twins. I think this a bit high, but I >think it is more common than we know. >> >>4. What else could this blood be from? > >Marginal seperation of the placenta, threatened abortion >> >>5. I have a 16-month old. Could I have done damage by playing with her >>too rough--running, wrestling, picking her up? > >Very doubtful. You really can't do much to a healthy first trimester >pregnancy. They are very well protected... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:11:17 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (D.O'Brien) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Surgery: Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >I've been diagnosed with having a benign ovarian cyst (corpus luteum, >9cm+) and I am 10 weeks pregnant. My doctor feels that it should be >removed at 16-20 weeks, after the placenta has taken over...HOWEVER, I'm >finding it difficult to glean any further information from him than >' We'll chop you open and snip it out- You'll be fine.' >Which, as you can imagine, is none too reassuring.... >I'm worried silly about this operation- >There are no other 'complications', and I'm a healthy 23 year old with 2 >other children. Could you PLEASE send me some information on laparotomy >etc. during pregnancy, and outline the risks to the >a) my baby >b) myself and >c) my fertility >following this surgical procedure. >I would truly appreciate any help you could give me by way of >information - especially the risk it in relation to miscarriage, >premature labour or caesarean section labour. >PLEASE reply, as I have tried many sources- and yours seems the most >professional and my best chance of getting the information I so greatly >need. >Thanking you sincerely in advance, >D.O'Brien. > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:31:09 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Help regarding IUGR?? >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Nancy wrote: >> >>I am 22.5 wks pg and my baby has intrauterine growth retardation, >>measuring around 18-19 wks. I have a bicornuate uterus and had bleeding >>at 11 wks. I was also on progesterone suppositories because my level >>was low. I have had every test -amnio, cystic fibrosis, cmv, ana, >>antiphospholipid antibodies, and they have all come back normal. The >>baby is behind symmetrically which means the head isn't growing very >>well. My doctor says the prognosis is poor and suggests induction. I >>went today for a final u/s, and the heart is still beating and the baby >>grew. I am supposed to go in for induction, but am afraid I'm giving up >>too easily. Anyone else with similar experience? I feel I need more >>info. Please help!! > >Nancy, >I certainly feel bad for you in that you are in a difficult place. My >reservation comes in not having a diagnosis. Certainly there can be >syndromic things that will have normal chromosomes and cause this kind >of thing. Also there are skeletal dysplasias that can also cause this >with a normal karyotype. >You have to understand that you do not have to have an induction. >Another option would be to manage things expectantly and see what >happens. The growth issue is a big item. Depending on the solidarity >of the dating, there is a variation of 1+ weeks at this gestational age. >If the dates are not solidly accurate, then the growth restriction may >not be as pronounced as thought. I would just make sure that the >calculations and comparisons are being made appropriately... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:37:15 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Surgery: Ovarian Cyst in Pregnancy >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, D.O'Brien wrote: >> >>I've been diagnosed with having a benign ovarian cyst (corpus luteum, >>9cm+) and I am 10 weeks pregnant. My doctor feels that it should be >>removed at 16-20 weeks, after the placenta has taken over...HOWEVER, I'm >>finding it difficult to glean any further information from him than >>' We'll chop you open and snip it out- You'll be fine.' >>Which, as you can imagine, is none too reassuring.... >>I'm worried silly about this operation- >>There are no other 'complications', and I'm a healthy 23 year old with 2 >>other children. Could you PLEASE send me some information on laparotomy >>etc. during pregnancy, and outline the risks to the >>a) my baby >>b) myself and >>c) my fertility >>following this surgical procedure. >>I would truly appreciate any help you could give me by way of >>information - especially the risk it in relation to miscarriage, >>premature labour or caesarean section labour. >>PLEASE reply, as I have tried many sources- and yours seems the most >>professional and my best chance of getting the information I so greatly >>need. >>Thanking you sincerely in advance, >>D.O'Brien. > >D.O., >Seeing as how the corpus luteum will become unneccesary from this point, >if this is a corpus luteum, it will begin to decrease in size. If that >happens and the cyst begins to get smaller, even if it doesn't >completely resolve, it can be followed closely and not surgically >addressed. If it remains the same size, it should be surgically >addressed-If so, I truly hope they don't "chop" you open. > >The "chopping" should best occur in the second trimester if required. >This is the safest time for you and most importantly the baby. The risk >of the anesthetics, preterm labor, etc. are lowest at this time... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 15:50:00 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Ann) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test) >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >Hi: > >I posted earlier this week when I found out I had failed my one hour >test. I had a question then and I have another one now. > >Today I took the 3 hour GTT. I drank about 24 oz of water about an hour >and a half to an hour and forty-five minutes before beginning the first >blood draw. (the fasting blood draw). Could that skew the results in >any way? Also, when I went back to take the second blood draw, the >phlebotomist was 15 minutes late in taking my blood so instead of it >being an hour after the glucola, it was an hour and fifteen minutes. >Would that have skewed the data? I went back to take the other two blood >draws on time from the original start of test time (time from which I >drank the glucola) so I they were uneventful. Neither girl could give >me an exact answer re: these two questions although they did both say >that you cannot drink water after the test has begun. Please advise. By >the way, the test both came back normal. > >Thanks for your input. > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:25:20 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Janna) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: BH Contractions >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >Hey Julie-I've always been told that some have them and some >don't...:-)It's just your uterus getting ready for the birth! Your doc >will be able to look for signs as you visit him each week. Good luck! > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Julie wrote: >> >>I have a questions about Braxton Hicks contractions. I've been having >>them pretty steadily (about 10 or more a day) since about 30 weeks. I >>am 35 weeks now. Does having BH indicate anything about how my labor >>might be or is that all just tales? I've heard that it could make it >>easier. I also wonder if having them every day might indicate I could >>delivery earlier than my EDD of October 4. Just curious!! >> >>Thanks! > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:32:14 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Kara) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Drunk before finding out about pregnancy >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >A week before I found out I was pregnant I got extremely drunk, probably >the drunkest I have ever been. I know that in those first few weeks the >baby's brain begins developing and I am wondering if it will adversely >affect my baby. I also had an endometrial biopsy a few days before I >found out, but my doctor said since I haven't miscarried then it means >that the embryo was unharmed and there shouldn't be any problems from >that. Does this sound right? I am really worried that I will have a >freak baby! > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:45:21 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (EMK) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Tubal Ligation Failure Question >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >I had a tubal ligation performed in 1992, the day after the birth of my >second child. I do not know the exact procedure used (clips, etc) but >seem to recall cauterization being performed (though not for certain). >Within the last few weeks, I've had several pregnancy symptoms occuring, >but this is not unusal for me, as I have a prolactinoma and often >experience some of these symptoms, such as morning sickness and >lactation. However, the symptoms I am currently experiencing are a >"evening" sickness, repeated burping, lethargy, and change in appetite. >(I had evening sickness and burping in both pregnancies.) My period last >month was very short and very light, but again this did not bother me. I >often get periods ranging from 2-4 days, usually moderate for the first >1-2 days and light the rest. Also, during both of my pregnancies, I >experienced periods during the first trimester. My first pregnancy was >discovered at 16 weeks and my second one at 12 weeks! On both occasions, >the last period I experienced was very light and short. What is the >probability of being pregnant eight years after a tubal ligation has >been performed? > >Thanks, >EMK > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:17:10 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Jennifer) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: repeated miscarriage and use of prometrium >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >After 5 miscarriages my physician has put me on prometrium. I am 8 >weeks pregnant and an ultrasound yesterday showed good fetal development >with heartbeat. However, no corpus luteum was seen on either fallicle. >I'm interested in responses from women who have taken prometrium and the >effects it had on their pregnancy. > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:32:38 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Tonja) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Am I hurting the baby? >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >Out of curiosity, by what means did the hospital tell you it was a boy >the first time? Ultrasound? Amnio? I doubt you'll get an OB to perform >an ultrasound for the sole purpose of satisfying your curiosity, but I >suppose anything's possible - I have known women who were tight with >different sonographers and had multiple ultrasounds for that very >purpose. Keep in mind, however, that even with multiple sonograms, some >women are just destined for a "surprise" in the delivery room! > >Tonja > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Esmeralda wrote: >> >>Yes, I want to be sure it's a boy. >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: anonymous@obgyn.net [mailto:anonymous@obgyn.net >>Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2000 2:46 PM >>To: Multiple recipients of list PREGNANCY-BIRTH >>Subject: Re: Am I hurting the baby? >> >>Any time someone does something against your will that hurts you either >>physically or emotionally, it is NOT okay. If you've asked your husband >>to stop the rough horseplay, explained that it hurts, etc. and he has >>ignored your wishes, it might be time to get serious with him and/or >>seek some counseling. Furthermore, a 33-week pregnant mother being >>pushed off of a bed is NOT okay under any circumstances and by all >>means, this behavior needs to stop ***immediately.*** Your baby's most >>likely okay physically as he's well protected in there, but if for >>nothing other than respect for his wife and unborn child, your husband >>needs to comply with your wishes and behave appropriately. If you're >>concerned about injury to your baby, don't hesitate to mention it to >>your doctor. >> >>Intercourse should be fine unless you've been advised otherwise by a >>medical caregiver or unless it results in regular contractions. As far >>as the sono, most doctors won't do a sono this late in the game simply >>for the purpose of determining sex, but if you feel comfortable asking, >>you don't have much to lose. >> >>I would be more concerned with the other issue, frankly. I'm sure your >>husband means no harm to you or your baby, but when his wife is reduced >>to tears after "play," it's time to stop. >> >>Good luck to you... >> >>Tonja >> >>At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, anonymous@obgyn.net wrote: >>> >>>I wanted to ask, my husband i sometimes very tuff he plays to tuff, and >>>sometimes pushes me around or pushes me off the bed but very ruff, and >>>that hurts my feelings so i start crying, and i cry for ever, could the >>>baby be hurt that way, or is it okay that he does that? and is having >>>intercourse with him okay this far along that i am? I wanted to ask too, >>>i want to know if i am having a boy they had told me at the hopital that >>>it was a boy but could i ask my doctor for a sono done, or is it to late >>>i will be 33 weeks when i go back. >> >>-- >>Tonja Brossette >>OBGYN.net Coordinator >>Pregnancy & Birth >>tonja.brossette@obgyn.net >> > >-- >Tonja Brossette >OBGYN.net Coordinator >Pregnancy & Birth >tonja.brossette@obgyn.net > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:35:21 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Tonja) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Drunk before finding out about pregnancy >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >How far along were you during the drinking binge? > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Kara wrote: >> >>A week before I found out I was pregnant I got extremely drunk, probably >>the drunkest I have ever been. I know that in those first few weeks the >>baby's brain begins developing and I am wondering if it will adversely >>affect my baby. I also had an endometrial biopsy a few days before I >>found out, but my doctor said since I haven't miscarried then it means >>that the embryo was unharmed and there shouldn't be any problems from >>that. Does this sound right? I am really worried that I will have a >>freak baby! > >-- >Tonja Brossette >OBGYN.net Coordinator >Pregnancy & Birth >tonja.brossette@obgyn.net > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:42:05 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Tonja) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test) >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >The water may have been a bad idea and could have diluted the glucola, >possibly skewing the results. I know with both of my GTTs (both of >which I had to take the 3-hr. "challenge", both of which came back >normal), there were at least two instances where my blood was drawn 10 >or 15 minutes late - I was told it wasn't a concern. During the tests >with both of my pregnancies, NO water or food was drilled into my head >at least a dozen times! > >On the upside, TONS of women who failed the initial glucose test and had >to take the challenge have gone on to pass it with no problems at all >(me included), so just because you failed the first one, and passed the >second, it doesn't mean the results of the second were skewed - there >are simply a lot of false and borderline positives with the initial >test. > >If you're concerned about the water intake issue, by all means, ask your >care provider. > >Tonja > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Ann wrote: >> >>Hi: >> >>I posted earlier this week when I found out I had failed my one hour >>test. I had a question then and I have another one now. >> >>Today I took the 3 hour GTT. I drank about 24 oz of water about an hour >>and a half to an hour and forty-five minutes before beginning the first >>blood draw. (the fasting blood draw). Could that skew the results in >>any way? Also, when I went back to take the second blood draw, the >>phlebotomist was 15 minutes late in taking my blood so instead of it >>being an hour after the glucola, it was an hour and fifteen minutes. >>Would that have skewed the data? I went back to take the other two blood >>draws on time from the original start of test time (time from which I >>drank the glucola) so I they were uneventful. Neither girl could give >>me an exact answer re: these two questions although they did both say >>that you cannot drink water after the test has begun. Please advise. By >>the way, the test both came back normal. >> >>Thanks for your input. > >-- >Tonja Brossette >OBGYN.net Coordinator >Pregnancy & Birth >tonja.brossette@obgyn.net > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:44:48 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Cindy) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: First Trimester Question >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >I am 6 weeks pregnant. 2 previous ectopics but this one made it to the >uterus!! The past 3 days I have had a nasty one-sided pain that extends >to my back and down my leg. No pain when urinating. The baby is in the >uterus so ectopic is out. I have no appendix or gallbladder so I am >confused what this could be. Please help. Being tossed around in the >military system is not helping. > >-- >Cindy > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 17:58:45 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test) >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Ann wrote: >> >>Hi: >> >>I posted earlier this week when I found out I had failed my one hour >>test. I had a question then and I have another one now. >> >>Today I took the 3 hour GTT. I drank about 24 oz of water about an hour >>and a half to an hour and forty-five minutes before beginning the first >>blood draw. (the fasting blood draw). Could that skew the results in >>any way? Also, when I went back to take the second blood draw, the >>phlebotomist was 15 minutes late in taking my blood so instead of it >>being an hour after the glucola, it was an hour and fifteen minutes. >>Would that have skewed the data? I went back to take the other two blood >>draws on time from the original start of test time (time from which I >>drank the glucola) so I they were uneventful. Neither girl could give >>me an exact answer re: these two questions although they did both say >>that you cannot drink water after the test has begun. Please advise. By >>the way, the test both came back normal. >> >>Thanks for your input. > >Ann, >Neither the drinking water or the 15 minute late draw should >significantly affect the test... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:02:31 -0500 (CDT) >------------------------------ >From: anonymous@obgyn.net (Lynn D. Montgomery, MD) >To: anonymous@obgyn.net >Subject: Re: Drunk before finding out about pregnancy >Message-ID: <anonymous@obgyn.net> > >At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Kara wrote: >> >>A week before I found out I was pregnant I got extremely drunk, probably >>the drunkest I have ever been. I know that in those first few weeks the >>baby's brain begins developing and I am wondering if it will adversely >>affect my baby. I also had an endometrial biopsy a few days before I >>found out, but my doctor said since I haven't miscarried then it means >>that the embryo was unharmed and there shouldn't be any problems from >>that. Does this sound right? I am really worried that I will have a >>freak baby! > >Kara, >There is just no way to know for sure, but it isn't likely that the baby >will be affected. Most of the fetal alcohol stuff is based on chronic >alcohol usage. There is no answer to the amount that may place the >fetus at risk... >Lynn > >-- >Lynn D. Montgomery, MD >Director, Maternal-Fetal Medicine >Rocky Mountain Perinatal Center >Missoula, Montana > >**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options and/or interventions. > >**Private e-mails cannot be entertained due to time constraints, consequently no private e-mails will receive a response. > >**Thank you for your understanding ;-) > >------------------------------ > >------------------------------ >End of PREGNANCY-BIRTH Digest 880 >------------------------------ >********************************* >




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 13:42:10 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com