Re: nuchal fold thickness
From: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 20:54:48 -0600 (CST)
With no other "stigma" of Down's, the outcome is usually good
(fortunately).
Did they recommend an amniocentesis? If they didn't, they're probably
not too concerned about the statistical risk.
Hope this helps and write back anytime for more information.
HSM
At Thu, 30 Nov 2000, TC wrote:
>
>My wife and I are both 24 years old and expecting our first baby in
>march. We went for an utlrasound at 23 weeks it showed a nuchal fold
>thickness of 6.4mm our first ultrasound at 11 weeks didnt show this
>thickness. our doctor sent us to a paranatoligist they also prefromed
>an ultrasound and it got a measurement of 7mm and they told us that this
>could be a marker for down syndrome, but they were unable to find any
>other markers such as abnormal femer length or stomach and heart defects
>everything was excellent, exept for the thickness. we have no family
>history of any genetic birth defects. we are pretty worried... sould
>we be? has anyone else been in a simalar situation? and if so what was
>the outcome?
--
Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS
Great Neck, New York
**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only
and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship.
This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to
consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options
and/or interventions.
**Private emails cannot be entertained due to time constraints,
consequently no private emails will receive a response.
**Thank you for your understanding ;-)
Please be aware that all e-mail on this forum is archived and can be viewed at
http://forums.obgyn.net/womens-health,
http://forums.obgyn.net/pregnancy-birth or
http://forums.obgyn.net/young-women
and is accessible to anybody on the
internet including internet search engines. This should be taken into
consideration before sending postings of a personal or confidential nature.