PREGNANCY-BIRTH Messages for November, 2000: Re: Aimstick vs EPT

Re: Aimstick vs EPT

From: CAM (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Thu, 30 Nov 2000 16:42:37 -0600 (CST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Barbara: "Re: Aimstick vs EPT"
Previous message: Carmen: "Re: Cleocin=BV??"
In reply to: Barbara: "Aimstick vs EPT"
Next in thread: Barbara: "Re: Aimstick vs EPT"
Reply: Barbara: "Re: Aimstick vs EPT"

At Thu, 30 Nov 2000, Barbara wrote: >
>I tested with the Aimstick after about 6 hours of sleep (read: after
>holding urine for 6 hours :) and at three minutes didn't see anything,
>but after I went back in the bathroom about 15-20 minutes later there
>was a faint but definite line in the 'positive' window.
>I then bought an EPT test and tested in the afternoon, and got a
>'negative'.
>I know the Aimstick is more sensitive than the EPT, but I was wondering
>if anyone else has had a similar experience.
>And how long I should wait before re-testing.
>My cycles are irregular so I am not 'expecting' my period at any certain
>time, but I have begun to chart and my temps have been above the
>coverline for 10 days, and the last three they have went up 2 degrees
>past the previous seven.
>Thank you,
>
>--
>Barbara

>Barbara, Aimstick is "stronger than EPT" Morning urine has better concentration than the afternoon one. After 10 days of ovulation it is normal to have negative EPT, even Aimstick. Iknow that instructions talk about the 10 minutes evapoartion line, but I HAVE NEVER HAD A POSITIVE EVAPORATION LINE with AIMSTICK, even if I wait for hours...
I think you may be pregnant. Test again in the next two days to confirm.

Next message: Barbara: "Re: Aimstick vs EPT"
Previous message: Carmen: "Re: Cleocin=BV??"
In reply to: Barbara: "Aimstick vs EPT"
Next in thread: Barbara: "Re: Aimstick vs EPT"
Reply: Barbara: "Re: Aimstick vs EPT"

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
	Returns per screen: Require all keywords: