![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: 3 hour GTT (glucose tolerance test)for Dr. Montgomery and other medical personnelFrom: Ann (anonymous@obgyn.net)Wed, 30 Aug 2000 18:37:10 -0500 (CDT)
Thanks Dr. Montgomery and Tonja for your input! I had just happened to read a publication from the NIH re: these tests shortly after I posted that question and it said that water wasn't an issue. (Although the lab techs said NO WATER after the glucola, which I can understand a bit more since I am thinking it "might" lessen the effect of the sugar somehow. Not sure but who knows?) However I do have another question re: these tests: when I took the first test it was a non-fasting 1 hour GTT and that is the one that I failed. The second test I took was the fasting 3 hour GTT. According to my MD after an hour of taking that first test blood sugar above 140 was an indication of possible gestational diabetes. When taking the 3 hr. GTT the first hour blood draw revealed a level of 153, but according to my MD and the NIH this is perfectly acceptable as it would have to be 190 mg/dl or higher to be considered part of a diagnostic criteria (with 120 mg/dl being the normal mean value) I have other women telling me that they took the 1 hour GTT as a fasting test and I am wondering if A) the diagnostic criteria are the same and B) what would the difference be between the cut off of 140 for the 1st take and the higher level of the second test? I am not panicking or anything I am just curious to how the data is assimilated and why patients are instructed differently in the 1 hr. GTT? Thanks for your insight.
At Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Lynn D. Montgomery, MD wrote:
>
|
|
Return to ![]()
Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:17:49 2008