search:

Re: ?? on heartrate and dating on first ultrasound

From: jwang,MD (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 20:02:28 -0500 (CDT)


4d difference isn't concerning. The heart rate of 90 is a bit low, but is not necessarily a bad sign. I would suspect that you will have another US next week for follow up. I think it will be fine at that point.

At Mon, 14 Aug 2000, Monica wrote: >
>I am 6w3d past IUI. This morning was my first u/s. Tech said fetal
>pole measured only 5w6d...is the 4 day difference of concern, or most
>likely just inaccurate measurement?
>
>Also, heartbeat was very visible, but rate was 92...nurse said this is
>very low. However, a friend who is due in one month said her baby's
>heartbeat was 90 at 6w and her RE said that is fine at this point. Is
>92 so low that I should be concerned? I'm having trouble finding early
>heart rate info on the web. Thank you.

--
J Wang, M.D
Assitant Clinical Prof.
Tufts University School of Medicine

>**Note: Opinions expressed here are for educational purposes only >and, as such, do not constitute a physician-patient relationship. >This information is not intended to supplant the need for you to >consult with your physician prior to choosing therapeutic options >and/or interventions.>




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pregnancy & birth forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ Pregnancy & Birth Forum ] Report TECHNICAL Problems ONLY to: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Thu Jun 18 13:39:10 2009

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com