Re: pregnancy

• Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
• Next message: Lisa: "Re: Donor Insemination"
• Previous message: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Spotting"
• Maybe in reply to: oscar: "pregnancy"

William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG wrote:

> At Sat, 29 Apr 2000, oscar wrote:
> >
> >my wife and I planned our baby, so we did not have sexual intercourse
> >2-3 months before Oct 10, 1999,(the date that we did have sexual
> >intercourse) and we did not have sexual intercourse 2-3 months after
> >this date. If all goes well, what will be the date of birth, normal 9
> >months pregnancy?
> >thank you for your time.
>
> Oscar
> According to Naegle's rule, it is 'minus 3 months, plus 7 days'. That
> makes it July 17, 2000.
> Remember, this is only the DUE date. I think the baby will have a
> little more to say about its birthdate. Good Luck.
>
> --
> William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG
> Editorial Advisor-Pregnancy and Birth
> Private Practice
> New Orleans, La.
>
> *Please understand I can not respond to private emails.
>
> *These comments are for educational purposes only. They are
> not meant to take the place of an examination by a qualified
> health care provider. They are not intended to be the start
> of a physician-patient relationship.
>

• Next message: Lisa: "Re: Donor Insemination"
• Previous message: William F. von Almen, II, MD, FACOG: "Re: Spotting"
• Maybe in reply to: oscar: "pregnancy"