![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Risks vs. Benefits of AmniocentesisFrom: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 4 Apr 2000 21:31:18 -0500 (CDT)
At Tue, 4 Apr 2000, anonymous wrote: > >I was very disheartened to read an earlier post from a woman who >suffered a miscarriage shortly after amnio (at 16 weeks). After seeing >my doctor yesterday, I agreed to have an amnio done in three weeks (I'll >be turning 35 in the last trimester of my pregnancy). Now I am >wondering if I should change my mind and not do the amnio. > >My doctor seemed to indicate that there was only about a 1% chance of >complications resulting from the amnio. However, I am beginning to read >of more and more cases where something has gone wrong, including the >recent post from the woman who lost her baby at 16 weeks. The actual risk is 1 in 300 or 0.3%, not 1% (range of studies 1 oin 200 to 1 in 400)
>My doctor is not going to be doing the amnio, instead he plans to send It may.
>Also, can someone tell me the benefits of amnio besides identifying Only if they're chromosomal or if it is known in the family and it can be checked for specifically.
>I am beginning to think The AFP triple test will miss about 33% of Down's syndrome and a Quad test will miss between 20 and 25%. While still int he first trimester, a nuchal translucency measurement plus blood tests can be done and the detection rate is 90%.
>Thanks.
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS Great Neck, New York
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |