![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
Re: Amniocentesis and a mother turning 35.From: Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:44:14 -0600 (CST)
At Tue, 29 Feb 2000, anonymous wrote: > >When I went to my first prenatal appointment yesterday, I was advised by >my doctor that because I would turn 35 during the pregnancy I should >consider amniocentesis. I'm not sure whether to do this or not. I'm >going to be 34 for the majority of my pregancy (all but two months), so >I don't see why it should be considered. I don't see how my risks can >suddenly go up just because I'm going to be 35 towards the end of my >pregancy. Any advice? Thanks. Mary Shoup's post was excellent and I highly recommend it. The answer to your question about age 35 is that the stats are for women who deliver AT age 35 - period. The risk is a gradual increase. The reason for age 35 is that the risk of genetic abnormality and the risk of pregnancy loss are about equal at age 35.
-- Harvey S. Marchbein, M.D. FACOG, FACS Great Neck, New York
|
| |
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | internationale-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer | This information is provided for educational purposes only. Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved. Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com |