![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Ganglion,for ReneeFrom: Renee (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 08 Feb 2002 07:43:13 -0800
Barbara, I didn't say that you didn't have a ganglion. You asked what could be causing the tingling. Several people gave some options, I gave some more options, and suggested that it be assessed by a physician, since they all had different treatments. As far as chiropractors go, I know that they are trained extensively in the spine, and that they believe that many visceral ailments can be treated by adjusting the vertebrae around the origin or the spinal nerves that supply those organs. I feel, however, that they are often going outside their scope of practice. I worked with a PT who was also a chiropractor. She said that they were taught to do pelvic exams in school. I'm sorry, but I don't think that's the role of a chiropractor. I wouldn't go to my opthalmologist for a pap, I wouldn't go to a neurologist for a pregnancy, I wouldn't go to to a family practitioner to have a heart bypass, and I wouldn't go to a chiropractor for a non-spine or spinal nerve related condition. Though they all received training in these things in their schooling and residencies, it's not what they're best at. However, everyone can make that choice for themselves. It's your body, and you're responsible for it. You can see whomever you want for it. That's the same mantra I use for PCOS related concerns as well. And, I never said ganglions can't be cured. All I said is that many problems get harder to treat the longer they are there. For example, if a nerve is getting pinched coming out of the spine, the longer it's pinched (and being damaged), the longer it takes to recover after the problem is resolved (eg: surgery), and the greater liklihood that it won't come back 100%. If pain limits movement, the structures around the involved joints can stiffen. It then becomes harder to regain the strength and flexibility the longer it goes on before the pain is relieved. I also never said a ganglion is a cyst. I think you're mixing up messages. Regarding my parenthetical that research to support chiropractic beyond the acute stage, here's a quote from the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research's guideline on acute low back pain. These guidelines were developed by a large team of professionals from all related disciplines (including chiropractors) based on a reading of all available research. They did 15 guidelines on many different topics, and are well regarded. In fact, the ones in my field (there are 2) can be used in court as a standard of care. From the executive summary: "Manipulation seems helpful for patients with acute low back problems without radiculopathy when used within the first month of symptoms. If no symptomatic and functional improvement has been noted after 1 month of manipulative therapy, this treatment should be stopped and the patient reevaluated." Radiculopathy is radiating pain down through the nerve from the spine to the arm or leg. I think people mis-read my e-mail, and blended what I said with what other people said, and got angry at me. I went back and re-read what I wrote to be sure I didn't write something I didn't remember, but I didn't. I didn't write most of what people are accusing me of saying. Renee
Barbra Camara wrote:
>
-- Renee Cordrey, MSPT, MPH, CWS---
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 17:03:08 2008