![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Aldactone QuestionFrom: Renee (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 16 Oct 2001 07:55:35 -0700
Aldactone is neither a steroid nor a hormone. It is primarily a diuretic, which makes you pee more. The original use was to lower blood pressure and to decrease blood volume for cases of congestive heart failure. The secondary use is an an androgen blocker in cases like ours. The message you responded to has a good summary of the drug, and how it works, so I won't repeat it. I won't snip it to save space either, so it's there to read again. As far as reading things in a book, you always have to critically analyze things. I could publish a book saying that PCOS is nothing to worry about, it's just cosmetic, eat anything you want, and it's not big deal. We all know that's not true, but if someone else read it, they might believe it if they didn't think about it. They should look to see how I make my case. Does it look like I have an agenda? If I do (and it's ok to have one--you just have to be aware of their perspective), try to look through it. Do I support my case? Do I cite studies that support my statements? Am I consistent with what you already know? Does it make sense? If you knew from somewhere else that PCOS has something to do with insulin, you might wonder if the "eat anything you want' point was consistent. Does it make sense with what you already know? My point is, you can publish anything. Some people have a view point that all medications are bad in the long-term. They think we shouldn't put any chemicals into our bodies. That's a valid point. However, you have to look at it in the grander scale: which is worse in the long run? I hated taking any pills. I'd even put up with a headache instead of taking a Tylenol. However, I had to realize that the PCOS was far more serious and would have serious implications in the long term; that was worse than taking some meds daily. So, think about what book you read that statement in. Did they cite a study showing bad effects of taking Aldactone for many years? Specifically, was that study done in PCOS women? Our physiology is different than women without PCOS, so a study like that can't be generalized to us. You can usually find out the population studied in the title of the study. Taking it the next step would be to get a copy of the article and analyze it to see if it was high quality, how many subjects, etc. But, you would probably only do it if you really wanted to investigate it deeply, or were writing your own article or book. So, we can't accept everything we see in a book. The publishers don't usually have an "expert panel" review it for accuracy. They just publish what they think people will buy. Think critically about everything you see. My hunch is that that author was mistaken, since Aldactone is not a hormone or a steroid, and has an anti-med viewpoint, which affects what she writes and how she presents her case (the same with a pro-med person). Renee
Linda wrote:
>
-- Renee Cordrey, MSPT, MPH, CWS---
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 17:00:47 2008
Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote
home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international