search:

Re: braun silk epil?

From: Joy (anonymous@obgyn.net)
Sun, 29 Apr 2001 17:07:04 -0500 (CDT)


Jodi - $42 is a good price - and I do not think the shaver head attachment is especially useful so I would not pay much extra for it. There are much better electric shavers on the market.

Hope the new unit works well for you!

--
Joy

At Sun, 29 Apr 2001, jodi wrote: > >thanks joy. i've been doing some searching online for sources to buy >just the head but i seem to only be able to find the whole unit. i >guess that's just as well as they seem to have totally changed the silk >epil from the one i have! now it has these little rubber strips that are >supposed to make it less painful to use... i have found the unit for 42 >dollars which is less than i paid for mine, so i think i might just buy >a new one. i have also found it with the shaving attachment but i don't >think i really want that part, unless it is a really good shaver head? > >At Sun, 29 Apr 2001, Joy wrote: >> >>Hi Jodi - I was not the previous poster you were thinking of but I have >>had pretty good luck with the Braun Silk Epil in certain areas. They do >>still make it - I got mine in the last year from QVC. I have only been >>using it for a year or so but find it VERY helpful on areas like stomach >>- chest/cleavage areas. It works quickly in those areas (at most 30 >>seconds) and takes about 3 weeks for the hair to return (and I seem to >>grow hair awfully fast). I have not used it on my legs - I think it >>would just be too time consuming so I just shave my legs. The place >>where I have the most bothersome hair is my chin/neck and it is not >>especially useful there for me since its ability to remove the really >>coarse hair requires more hair length then I am willing to let grow >>there. It will definetely pull the coarse hairs but not at stubble >>length (at least not for me). >> >>I don't know if the tweezers on the head of the unit eventually wear out >>or not - but I have never seen components of the unit sold seperately so >>I suspect you may have to buy a new one if that is the case. While it >>was not cheap (around $50 I think and it came with electric shaver >>attachments, cleaner, etc.) - I consider it a worthwhile purchase given >>the speed of hair removal and the act it stays away for a few weeks. >>Good luck >> >>-- >>Joy >> >>At Sun, 29 Apr 2001, jodi wrote: >>> >>>i know that once when i was trashing this demonic little hair yanker, >>>someone said that they have actually had good success with it... who >>>was it? are you reading this? :) >>> >>>even if you're not that person, does anyone else use this little device? >>>i have decided to give it another whirl this summer... but i am finding >>>it doesn't work as well as it used to! it took me a half hour to do a >>>not even total job on ONE lower leg. this is no good... i already >>>waste too much time on hair removal. >>> >>>i used it a little bit a few weeks ago and it seemed to work ok then, so >>>i doubt it's just a matter of my hair becoming even more stubborn... i >>>am wondering if the tweezing units need adjusted, or if maybe you have >>>to buy a new head every now and then? >>> >>>i bought this thing like... 6 years ago, but i really only used it for >>>one year or so. i guess i'm not even sure if they still make it! but >>>i'd like to know, if anyone else uses this, if you have had the problem >>>of less effective tweezing over tim? >>> >>>- jodi >>




recommended search...
Google
OBGYN.net forums endometriosis zone Web

use when must restrict search to only the pcos forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:
Return to [ PCOS Discussion Forums ] Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:57:29 2008

Women's Insurance Checklist from Auto Insurance Quote

home | medical professionals | women | industry | forums | international
e-mail | about us | advertising | our sponsors | contact us | disclaimer |

This information is provided for educational purposes only.
Please read the disclaimer. ©1996-2008, all rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission of MediSpecialty.com