![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: Medical rapeFrom: =?iso-8859-2?q?Zalányi Sámuel ?= (anonymous@obgyn.net)Tue, 18 Mar 2003 17:25:48 +0100
Hi Nicki, Could you tell us the reason of disseminating this far off-topic information? I read the article: it is about ONE SINGLE teaching hospital, where it happened, and there may have been other occasions many years ago in other teaching hospitals. This is very brave to invite women to suite doctors, and I am sure that given the circumstances in the US they will win millions as you suggest. There is an other side of the coin however. Those medical students have to learn the skills of examinations, operations etc. And naturally they will not be skilled at the first occasion, not even at the second. So if they are not given the chance to try, they will never learn. I have been working in a teaching hospital and know how difficult it is to find patients agreeing to pelvic exams. With all this, I am not telling that examining anaesthetised patients without consent is OK, just trying to make you understand. Also, I don't think this is a reason to refuse general anaesthesia. There are many procedures unsuitable for local. As for suing: whatch the situation in the US. The tendency to litigate doctors (and companies for that matter) has led to mistrust between drs and patients, to increasing the number of unnecessary lab and technical examinations (fully knowing them to be supreflous, only avoiding legal consequences) and rendering medical costs increase terribly. In other countries (eg. Sweden) where people are less litigating, the medical care is far better and much less expensive. Litigations only help the members of the bar association not patients. Good luck with doctors and go on litigating them Sam M.D., Ph.D.
> The attached article about doctors parading medical students into the OR
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:29:11 2008