![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: article (long)From: Victoria (anonymous@obgyn.net)Fri, 20 Sep 2002 7:14:26 -0400
Thanks for the research. Actually there was one article that has come out since that gives a positive to HRT. It had to do with the breast, but I can't remember further. I wasn't going to post it, because my feeling is that people would dismiss it or wouldn't believe it. I would somewhat disagree with the premise of using HRT as a reason to go to a naturopathic person. That's the same argument I've seen in other places. It ignored the fact that there are other HRT's and ERT's that were not discontinued, it was only the Prempro arm. I did some information on it back when it came out (women's health list), questioning things and all that, and it wasn't what people wanted to believe. Just what is 'medical researcher'? I've never seen that title.
-- Victoria
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:28:15 2008