![]() |
||||
|
|
||||
|
|
||||
Re: PregnancyFrom: Renee (anonymous@obgyn.net)Sat, 03 Aug 2002 14:27:06 -0700
Heard et al. Fertil Steril 2002 Apr;77(4):669-73 They gave PCOS women met, and if they didn't start to ovulate, added clomid. In 40% ovulated on met alone. 42% conceived within 15 months of study. 69% of the conceptions were within 6 months. The miscarriage rate of all the women studied was 35%. High drop-out/drop-off-met rate. CJ Glueck et al, J Invest Med 2000 He kept some women on met for the whole pregnancy, and stopped with pregnancy for others. 45% miscarriage without met, 9% with. Jakubowicz et al. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2002 Feb;87(2):524-9 The early pregnancy loss rate in the metformin group was 8.8% (6 of 68 pregnancies), as compared with 41.9% (13 of 31 pregnancies) in the control group (P < 0.001). In the subset of women in each group with a prior history of miscarriage, the early pregnancy loss rate was 11.1% (4 of 36 pregnancies) in the metformin group, as compared with 58.3% (7 of 12 pregnancies) in the control group (P = 0.002). You're right, Victoria, that there are many, many causes for PCOS. But, is is plausable that met helps to stabilize out some of the other hormonal imbalances involved with unsuccessful pregnancies, just as it helps stabilize other hormones in non-pregnant women (improved ovulation, decreased hirsutism, etc.). Victoria, I know you know the value of a control group. The Heard study you cite below may have been unfortunate in the population studied being particularly difficult to treat, by chance. Is this the same study as above? It didn't look at comparing Met to anything, really. It was more of an single group longitudinal study. The ones cited above aren't perfect either. But, they're fairly consistent in their findings. Renee
Victoria wrote:
>
-- -------------- Renee Cordrey, MSPT, MPH, CWS--- Dwell in Possibility. --Emily Dickenson
|
|
Return to ![]()
Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon May 19 16:19:52 2008