Re: IUD and PID
From: Steven Crawford (scrawfmd@zoomnet.net)
Sun May 30 09:44:12 1999
Dr Woolley,
Am I talking to a Family Medicine physician? Am I talking to a qualified OB/GYN or
an FP, who's residency training is just a bit different than mine, an OB/GYN????
Please let me know, and then we'll talk.....
Steve
"Robert J. Woolley" wrote:
> In message <37503639.68995522@zoomnet.net> writes:
> If you are of the
> > opinion
> > that NP's and other non physicians are capable of practicing medicine
> > INDEPENDENT of
> > physicians, then you will definitely see a drop in the overall quality of
> > delivering
> > medical care to patients. That is my opinion.
>
> It is an assertion of fact. So, can you point me to the empirical evidecne that
> it is true?
>
> I wish you would accept my
> > opinion
> > as simply being MY opinion, and not the law. I will never allow you or
> > anyone to
> > push your beliefs down my throat as law, as I would never think of pushing my
> > beliefs onto others.
>
> That's pretty funny, Steve, even though I'm sure unintentionally so. Unless you
> favor repealing all medical licensure laws and allowing patients to freelychoose
> what kind of practitioner they see (MD, chiropractor, NP, voodoo doctor,
> whatever), then you *are* pushing your beliefs onto others. You are endorsing a
> system which forces them into a narrow range of choices, and criminally
> prosecutes those who step onto physician's "turf" by practicing medicine without
> a license.
>
> Do you have any conception of the hypocrisy of one in your position claiming
> that he is not "pushing" his beliefs on anybody? *I* stand for genuine freedom
> of choice. *You* stand for coersion, restricted freedom, enforced monopoly.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Bob Woolley
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> St. Paul, Minnesota
>
> "A free society is most threatened not by uses of government
> that are obviously bad, but by uses of government that seem
> obviously good."
>
> -- Charles Murray
