-VISIT OUR OTHER FORUMS- OB-GYN-L Ultrasound Ultrasound History Fibroid Forum Physicians-in-Training Tech Talk OBSTET-L (portuguese) OBGIN-L (spanish) Nursing

Re: gynecologic oncologists From: Efrain Ramirez MD (eramirez@icepr.com) Wed Mar 31 15:56:52 1999 Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ] Next message: Jae-Sook Roh: "Re: pregnancy after tubal ligation reversal" Previous message: Geffrey Klein: "Re: gynecologic oncologists" In reply to: Scotia Phillips, RT, RDMS: "Re: Office Mammography" Next in thread: Paul Prior MD: "Re: gynecologic oncologists" Reply: Paul Prior MD: "Re: gynecologic oncologists" Well...what we have here...egos burning!!...finding anologies between "readily available" and "significant risk"...midwife---obstetrician...uf...look guys..let's keep this discussion simple...if you think that you can handle an ovarian malignancy...retroperitoneal lymphanedectomy, the works.....i.e.proper staging, then do it...do not consult nor do referrals..if can also do a better level II ultrasound than a good perinatologist..well go ahead....do them...I *know* that each one of you are aware of your one limitations..so the discussion is usless. You should do what is in the best interest for the patient..must individualized each and every case..medicine is not a cookbook. Geff I liked your posting on the "vanishing" specialty..good stuff! :-) At Wed, 31 Mar 1999, Braun, R. Daniel wrote: > >Define "significant risk", please. The NIH consensus conference didn't . >This is analogous to the ACOG "readily available" statement in the pitocin >and VBAC guidelines. >Dan >R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG >Clinical Professor >Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Indiana U. School of Medicine >Indianapolis, IN > > -----Original Message----- > From: sunmoonie@aol.com [SMTP:sunmoonie@aol.com] > Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 8:21 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L > Subject: gynecologic oncologists > > The following is an excerpt from the NIH Consensus Development > Conference Statement, April 5-7, 1994: > > "Women with ovarian masses who have been identified preoperatively >as > having a significant risk of ovarian cancer should be given the >option > of having their surgery performed by a gynecologic oncologist" -- Efrain Ramirez MD FACOG "The things you learn after you know everything are the important ones" Next message: Jae-Sook Roh: "Re: pregnancy after tubal ligation reversal" Previous message: Geffrey Klein: "Re: gynecologic oncologists" In reply to: Scotia Phillips, RT, RDMS: "Re: Office Mammography" Next in thread: Paul Prior MD: "Re: gynecologic oncologists" Reply: Paul Prior MD: "Re: gynecologic oncologists"

Return to

Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:31:02 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.