Re: gynecologic oncologists

From: Braun, R. Daniel (rbraun@iupui.edu)
Wed Mar 31 12:58:18 1999


There are rare cases where that is true. I personally can think of some specifics which I better not go into. Dan R. Daniel Braun, MD FACOG

-----Original Message----- From: evsono@pipeline.com [SMTP:evsono@pipeline.com] Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 1999 1:08 PM To: Multiple recipients of list OB-GYN-L Subject: Re: gynecologic oncologists

Bob,

are you suggesting that a gyn-oncologist would be less qualified to deal with suspected ovarian carcinoma than a generalist?

Art

At Tue, 30 Mar 1999, Robert J. Woolley wrote: >
>In message <4.1.19990330232830.009f8010@mail.enter.net> writes:
>> Bob:
>>
>> I don't think that's his (or her) position at all. It was just a
quote. The >> case could be made that with a significant risk for ovarian CA, a
gyn onc >> should at least be available. I don't disagree that the patient
should be >> given the option of a gyn onc for this type of surgery. In
practice, >> however, I find most women are happy to have them on standby. If
I truly >> believe it is an ovarian cs, I send right to the oncologist,
because they >> do a better job than I do
>
>Allow me to make my point more explicitly, then. I have particular
interests in >certain pieces of a general medical practice. In these particular
areas (e.g., >specific diseases or procedures), I am likely to have both more
interest and >more knowledge than the average specialist (say, dermatologist).
Suppose I take >the view that patients always have the "right" (whatever that
means) to be >referred to a specialist. If the patient before me has one of the
things in >which I have special knowledge and interest, then the referral may
well send him >or her to a person less qualified. This does not seem in the
patient's best >interest. (Not to say that I *wouldn't* if pressed, just that it
seems a shame >to go from a more qualified physician to a less qualified one.)
>
>In order to maintain that a patient with ovarian Ca always has the
right to >choose a gyn onc (meaning, presumably, more "right" than any other
patient has >to choose any other physician), one would, it seems to me, have to
believe that >such a choice is always going to be in her best interest. (Unless
you want to >bestow a special right to lesser-quality care, and if you do, I'd
like to know >why.)
>
>--

>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Bob Woolley
>---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>St. Paul, Minnesota
>
>"Life is made up of sobs, sniffles, and smiles,
>with sniffles predominating."
>
> -- O. Henry
>

-- art fougner, md SonoScan/Genetic Sciences forest hills, ny evsono@pipeline.com





use when must restrict search to only the ob-gyn-l forum...
Enter search keywords:
Returns per screen: Require all keywords:

Return to  OB-GYN-L Mail a New Message to the Forum: ob-gyn-l@obgyn.net
Forum Administrator: geffrey.klein@obgyn.net
Report Technical Problems: webmaster@obgyn.net
Last Updated: Mon Nov 2 05:31:02 2009

The American Medical Association is no longer designating CME hours for AMA Category II CME credit. However, physicians themselves may self designate learning activities as Category II CME credit hours if they feel it is of sufficient educational merit and meets the formal definitions of continuing medical education. OBGYN.net believes these interaction in this forum meets these criteria. For further information see the AMA web site.